Opinion/Commentary: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) revisited

Three years ago, I wrote a post about how Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is often misconstrued, reduced to nothing more than thought challenging, and blamed when it does not appear to work in therapy. Common misconceptions about CBT were addressed in my article then.

Today’s post is perhaps a timely update of my previous article, featuring excerpts (in black and italics) that are quoted directly from an interview done by Dr Judith Beck with the Australian Psychological Society. In writing this post, what was comforting to me was recognising that my understanding of CBT is aligned with the official narrative espoused by Dr Beck. Nevertheless, CBT continues to be misunderstood and wrongly implemented in therapy. I have witnessed how training programmes continue to teach CBT the way it was first conceptualised in the 1960s. That is a great disservice to trainees and clients alike. Hence, I hope that through writing about it someone out there will be positively impacted. That is the motivation behind this post.

Source: The past, present and future of cognitive behavioural therapy with Dr Judith Beck.

So… What is CBT according to Dr Judith Beck?

“Our definition is that CBT is a psychotherapy based on a cognitive model – that the way people perceive situations is more closely connected to their reactions, behaviours, emotions, than the situation itself.”

– Dr Judith beck
CBT is not static; it is evolving and will continue to evolve.

“I get a little distressed when I hear people talking about CBT as if it should be practised the way it was first developed in the 1970s and 1980s because there has been so much progress.”

– dr judith beck
CBT is more than just techniques.

It is first and foremost a psychological therapy. This means that factors common to all psychotherapeutic treatments apply, such as the human element.

Closing

It is my wish that people be informed. I hope that this post (as well as the interview which I heavily quoted from) does what it had set out to do. Through it, may the ever-so-present myths about CBT be clarified.

Eugene

Published by Blue. Psychological Services

Blue. is a non-commercial, non-profit initiative offering anonymous pro bono psychological consultation.

One thought on “Opinion/Commentary: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) revisited

Leave a comment